Available on custom request. The ecosystem is mapped at baseline level on Expert — live figures below.
The urban modules matter more than the national envelope: 68.4 % of composition variance sits within countries (COTEE, H4). Live from Expert · pipeline 17 Aug 2026.
A country report does not add up a score. It reads the ecosystem as a cultivated order: the soil (rule enforcement) conditions what the seed (actors present) and the gardener (built support) can produce — then measures the meta-organization, gender inclusion and the AEEI pillars on the same grid.
Enforcement -0.69 (rules weakly applied); built support 52 %, base endowment 38 %; 38 % of actors created by the State or donors; 2 urban modules on 65 actors. Expected creation 1.3 → 6.4 new firms per 1,000 adults if rules were enforced: the soil, not the seed, is the binding constraint.
Coverage CI 100 % (world 100 %); functional differentiation FDI 0.91 (world 0.87); service redundancy SRI 3.61 (world 2.01); VRIO coverage 0.33 (world 0.21); effectiveness EES 0.72 (world 0.72); network density —. The report then applies the readings — resilience-adjusted redundancy, governance vs endowment, form vs substance, three-mechanism index — to Eswatini.
AGI 45/100 (economic 47, social —, representation 43), rank 30 / 53 in Africa and 126 / 176 globally; 1 women-focused structures out of 71 actors (14.1 ‰). Read next to the continental picture: mean 49, social dimension weakest (19/100), economic strongest (64/100).
Composite —, rank not ranked. Strengths: formal institutions (0.55), physical infrastructure (0.54), culture (0.40). Weaknesses: talent & knowledge (0.00, −0.32 vs mean), finance (0.08). Each pillar is sorted into Soil, Seed, Gardener or Environment and read conditionally on enforcement.
Eswatini scored on the ten entrepreneurial-ecosystem elements (Stam & van de Ven, 2021), grouped into 7 pillars and re-read through the COTEE framework on Expert.
On Expert, the AEEI elements are sorted into COTEE layers — Soil (rules), Seed (contents), Gardener (apparatus) — and read conditionally: contents only pay off where rules bind.
Source: AEEI — Africa Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Index (africa.ecosystem.build), 2026. Framework: the ten elements of Stam & van de Ven (2021). Delta = points vs Africa average.
No published Eswatini report yet, but its ecosystem is mapped at baseline level. Tell us what you need — full diagnostic, module deep-dive, comparative study — and we scope it together.
The same twelve sections for every country, computed on the latest requalified data.
Beyond the static report: live diagnostics, network analyses, the COTEE reading and the AEEI snapshot — free atlas, Institutional and Premium tiers.
Curated insights from our 117 ecosystems — new country reports, ranking shifts, methodology notes. No fluff, no spam, unsubscribe in 1 click.
By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your data.
The observatory. Data, diagnostics and decision tools for the builders of entrepreneurial ecosystems.
The academy. Capacity building deployed where it's needed — online, on-site, in ecosystem residency.
The research society. The scholars advancing the science of entrepreneurial ecosystems.
